1. Expansion
in adjoining areas due to hard combat:
Hard combat against the Naxals
pushes them out temporarily but they use other states to regroup and rearm.
This can be associated with the Andhra Pradesh model, where the intensive use
of Greyhounds had led to a lot of spill over to other states.
2. Expansion due to increasing association with
Anti-state forces:
New territory in new states may
result in a corridor for Naxals to collaborate with other insurgent groups who
are essentially ideologically different but are anti-state. There has
been increasing collaboration between the Naxals and the Pro-Azadi leaders in
J&K and ULFA training the naxal cadres.
3. Expansion of Naxal activities due to
international collaboration:
The
likely collaboration with international maoist movements, may give it a much
more dangerous dimension, to tackle which India seems to be unprepared. There
is also an increasing threat of rising terror outfits’ support to the naxal
operations in India.
4. Administrative
hurdles in dealing with LWE:
- Poor infrastructure, lack of communication and shortage of manpower
- A virtual parallel government run by Maoists in Dandakaranya region
- Poor coordination among various state police forces
- Lack of proper understanding between the central and state forces
5. Intellectual
support to naxalism:
Top intellectuals like Arundhati
Roy and Binayak Sen regularly support naxalism, advocating an egalitarian
society, human rights and tribal rights. But use of violent means cannot be
supported to achieve a noble cause in a democratic setup. Rather than a
blind support, the intellectuals should also encourage Naxals to eschew
violence, fight elections, join mainstream society and learn the art of give
and take of democratic bargaining without aggression.
Comments
Post a Comment